8 Dec

A Rose is a Rose is a Rose: an archive by any other name is an archive.

Under Archive definitions – Part of the difficulty is to do with language and terminology. Curators and archivists would agree that they are both involved with ‘collections’ and with ‘preservation’ and ‘access’ but disagree about their understanding of the terms. – Archives in Museums

…In the 3rd paragraph of EMMEDIA’s Mission Statement … Where Media Arts Live, it is stated: … A growing library of over 1100 electronic recordings by artists is housed on-site, along with a research library. …

The Mission Statement implies an encouragement to leave work with EM, and in fact, I believe as artist/producers, we were required to leave a copy of each work produced there. And we all know why: grant applications require proof that the facility is fulfilling its funded mandate.

Reading through the extended statement from December 1, I say bravo to EM in its plans for the new space and long-time-coming plans for … a full-time media arts gallery space to operate in conjunction with the screening space, as well as production, and editing facilities. … Bravo – yes, but when those contemporary and future works also become last year’s models, will their legacy become next year’s dumpster pickings?

As Artists, we work to exhibit and share our works. As the career progresses over time, there are many challenges to face, especially in the area of keeping that art career unfolding, evolving and floating. I have often thought of recognition and achievements as drops in a bucket. (Not to be confused with popular culture bucket list) And when a drop lands there; an exhibition, an article written about the work, or simply the achievement of bringing a work to completion, I move ahead thinking that – if there is no evaporation, there will be a few drops amounting toward the evidence of passage, of professional progress. So getting the news that EMMEDIA is dissolving the tape library and works will end up in the alley out back of the 11Ave and 4th Street SW location cuts deep. Whether working or studying in Calgary, in Chicago, freelancing in Montréal or Halifax, and places in-between, EMMEDIA has stood out for me like a beacon of progress on the prairie since the early 1980’s.

When I read the November 30 notification on Facebook, I immediately thought of the people who worked to set it up, the other moving pains that the organization survived, and the producers who are now there in the cultural memory only. I also thought of other artist/producers like myself who stay in touch and can be easily contacted through email. Here is a question: If the decision to dissolve the collection was not made in haste, and only decided after many years of consultation with various organizations, institutions and members, why were artist/producers only notified last week? Or am I the only one out here who just happened to find this on Facebook? Would it have been useful to open up the discussion for input?

While it would take too long and might not be in everyone’s interest to go through all of the points stated in the extended message from EMMEDIA (Dec 01), I will address the section on screening rights:

3. EMMEDIA does not retain any rights to member works
In 1979, several artists banded together to purchase a broadcast camera, and from that, EMMEDIA was born. The co-op mentality of these individuals carried over to many policies regarding member works that are still in place today. One of these is that EMMEDIA does not retain any rights to member works. Following our initial post regarding the status of the resource library, folks were quick to point out that the collection should be donated to an archival body. Indeed, this has been something that EMMEDIA staff, both past and present over many years have worked towards, however since our organization does not retain any rights to member works, we require explicit permission from every artist in the library in order to donate the collection en masse.

This would be possible to arrange. Some kind of webform with multiple-choice options – permitting viewing by Curators, without expected compensation – or not permitting viewing could be set up.

The fact is that an archive exists at EMMEDIA and that archive is part of its fabric and culture. If, in the new location, there is no accessible space to research the records, then maybe EM could invest in a pallet to shrink wrap the media and to store it in a cool dry space. Leave it together as a time capsule to be opened at a later date. Although there have been studies and statements about the viability of media stored under less than ideal conditions, it has been my experience to open up older media, even analogue tapes after several years, and to find them in excellent condition. There is always a question of the playback unit being available but they do exist if sought out. Stranger than fiction is the fascination with film media in contrast to the trash-and-burn policy shown to video culture.

Perpetual questions surrounding archives: What work will be saved, who will do the archiving, and who decides which works make it into that archive?

Notes:
Archives in Museums

INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL
ON ARCHIVES – Code of Ethics

 

Facts and Artifacts in the Collective Matrix, 2004 (Valerie LeBlanc et al.)

 

1 Dec

5th International Video Poetry Festival
55 VIDEO ARTISTS & POETS FROM 21 COUNTRIES
6 HOURS SHOW
SATURDAY10/12 STARTS 20.00

GREECE
H. Bozini + P. Papadopoulos | Th. Panou | Y. Deliveis
F. Averbach (Void Network) T. Kapouranis | A. Chatziioannidi
Ch. Sakellaridis | V. Velli | Y. Lianos (Lokatola Collective)
S. Oikonomidis |Demi Sam (Group Avgo) | K. Shabanova

THAILAND
R. Nurfarida

INDIA
S. Singh

MEXICO
P. R. Aranda | C. Bustamante

AUSTRIA
V. Sebert

VENEZUELA
A. M. Giner

BOLIVIA
L. Sellars

SOUTH KOREA
F. Harvor

ARMENIA
E. Boghosian

IRAN
M. Fathollahi

CANADA
S. Otter | M. Depatie | V. LeBlanc | D. H. Dugas

GERMANY
S. Wiegner

ITALY
P. Chiesa-S. Cinematografica
F. Gironi+G. Daverio | F. Bonfatti

ENGLAND
D. Douglas | C. Cameron | B. Dickinson | E. Cay
M. Piatek | A. Cook | O. Smith | J. L. Ugarte| D. Taylor | M. Lland

USA
S. Chang | H. Dewbery | S. Negus | H. Gray | M. Mullins
H. P. Moon | C. St. Onge | R. Anderson | T. Becker

RUSSIA
T. Moshkova | C. Preobrazhenskaya

ARGENTINA
L. Focarazzo

BELGIUM
P. Bogaert & J. Peeters

AUSTRALIA
M. Goldberg | I. Gibbins

SPAIN
Is. Martin | C. Moreno

SWITZERLAND
A. Prundaru

O καιρός της Τέχνης πέρασε πια. Το θέμα τώρα είναι να πραγματώσουμε
την Τέχνη, να κατασκευάσουμε αποτελεσματικά και σε όλα τα επίπεδα της ζωής ό,τι παλιότερα υποχρεωτικά
παρέμενε μια καλλιτεχνική αυταπάτη ή μια ανάμνηση που ο άνθρωπος ονειρευόταν ή συντηρούσε μονόπλευρα.
Δεν μπορούμε να πραγματώσουμε την Τέχνη παρά καταργώντας την. Ωστόσο, θα πρέπει να αντιταχτούμε
στην σημερινή κατάσταση της κοινωνίας, που καταργεί την Τέχνη αντικαθιστώντας την με την αυτόματη κίνηση
ενός θεάματος ακόμα πιο ιεραρχικού και παθητικού.Μπορούμε να καταργήσουμε την Τέχνη μόνο αν την πραγματώσουμε

organised by +the Institue [for Experimental Arts]
supported by Void Network

ΠΛΗΡΟΦΟΡΙΕΣ
http://theinstitute.info/?p=1488
FB EVENT
https://www.facebook.com/events/216056028835833/?active_tab=discussion

18 Nov

I presented an abridged French version of this talk at the Université de Moncton, on September 27, 2016. The talk was part of Visible/Invisible, a collaborative project with Daniel H. Dugas, Symposium d’art/nature September 22 – October 2, 2016.

Visible and Almost invisible : negotiating the impossible
September 21, 2016

How I came to the Symposium d’art/nature and the Parc Écologique du Millénaire, Moncton, or what can an artist do to draw attention to the acceleration of climate change.

COLLABORATION
When Daniel and I began to collaborate in 1990, we had each been working as artists for several years. To identify our collaborative partnership, we adopted the working name: Limit(E) productions which we continued to use for several years. We produced the multifaceted video installation: Transitory, during the time when we were earning our MFA’s at the School of the Art Institute of Chicago, 1991-93.

The installation involved a mulberry tree that was reconstructed and preserved. Above the tree, slides of colorized leaves were projected onto a circular reflector. A monitor built into the tree played a program of colorized leaves blowing in the wind. A talking car alarm with the sensor embedded into the tree warned viewers to ‘step back’ if they come too close. We created this work to represent an extreme infringement on nature and to protest the directions that developing technology appeared to be forging upon the human spirit. It seemed that we were entering a time period of tightened restraints on both the natural world and human culture.

We simultaneously produced the video series In Transit during the 1991-93 time period. We used a cut and paste method of uniting individual inputs of writing, video, sound and music. In Transit was an in extremis take on the time period and the culture of the early 1990’sin this high-density American city. Along with all of the great things happening in the city, Chicago was experiencing increased levels of violent crime rates. The statistics included 928 persons murdered in 1991 and 943 persons in 1992, before dropping to 856 in 1993, the year we graduated.

Our individual and collaborative projects continue to evolve. The concerns often move between public / private, and how technology structures influence and carry messages of change and growth. At the heart of our activities is an interest in the ways that economic, political, and sociocultural factors trickle down to infiltrate all aspects of human society. We work from a holistic point of view and a desire to establish a rapport between what is experienced and what is imagined; ideas that emerge to see the light of day, and those that remain below the surface.

MARKETING CONCEPTS OF VISIBILITY / INVISIBILITY

Much has been said about mirrors, about visibility and Invisibility, but while looking for points of discussion for this project, I was thinking of the idea that when we look into a mirror, we expect to see ourselves looking back. I was thinking about some of the work of Belgian surrealist artist Artist Réne Magritte when I came across a website with this portrait that I, at first, mistook for a spinoff of his work.

After reading through the highlights of the homepage:

YOU HAVE THE CHOICE TO TAKE CHARGE OF YOUR DESTINY –
WE CAN HELP YOU GET THERE IN STYLE

WE CAN HELP YOUR LAB STAND OUT IN A CROWD

WE CAN HELP YOUR BUSINESS

CRUSH THE COMPETITION !

I decided that the image looks more like Kevin Bacon as Hollow Man, in a very lame science fiction-horror thriller from the year 2000. And finding the site reminded me of the love / hate relationship I have with MARKETING.

Because we live in a time in history, and a place in the world where marketing RULES, we are constantly pitted against of the narrowing of opportunities and diversity. In all fields of interest, we are encouraged to specialize and to competitively advertise that specialty. The downside is that specialization sometimes implies that persons working through life in a variety of ways; changing course and hovering in some of the less travelled pathways, are perceived as not working seriously enough. Hope might lie in the prospect of parallel tracks where all aspects of human concerns might be addressed. Suspension of adherence to the forced pressure of specialized market economies would be required, to achieve a holistic environment.

WORKING IN THE INTERSTICE

In the early 1970’s, Artist Gordon Matta-Clark believed in stepping back to take a more careful look at where the progress of continued growth was taking us. His work during that time period continues to hold value. Trained as an architect, instead of building, he worked as a performer, photographer, and sculptor. His practice was diverse. He was probably most well known for making cuts in condemned buildings. While these cuts created spacial artworks in their own right, they also drew attention to environmental development in urban centres. For the Biennale de Paris,1975, he created the Conical Intersect, an antimonument. The construction of the then-controversial Centre Georges Pompidou necessitated the destruction of two 17th century historic buildings that had survived the two world wars. Cutting a large cone-shaped hole, at a forty-five-degree angle through the condemned townhouses, Matta-Clark directed the view from inside the buildings toward the site of the Pompidou. From the street view, it was possible to look back through, up into the skeleton of the townhouses.

While Gordon Matta-Clark used the destruction of whole architectures as a basis for his work in critiquing urban gentrification, the Earth Artists of the 1960’s and 70’s worked within landscapes to make monumental impact.

EARTH ARTISTS

Dennis Oppenheim was an American conceptual artist, performance artistearth artist, sculptor and photographer. While still a student, Gordon Matta-Clark worked with Dennis Oppenheim on his Annual Rings,1968. The project is described as inspired by the annual rings of tree growth. Pathways were shoveled in the snow on either side of the frozen waterway dividing the Unites States and Canada, and their time zones. Drawing attention to national and temporal man-made boundaries through this ephemeral work, Oppenheimer questioned the relative values of ordering systems that we live by.

Having died in 1973, Robert Smithson is remembered for his use of photography in relation to sculpture and land art. The Spiral Jetty, 1970 and the documentary film based on its construction are considered to be his signature work. Constructed on the Northeastern shore of the Great Salt Lake, Utah, the sculpture is built of mud, salt crystals and basalt rock. Since the initial construction of Spiral Jetty, questions regarding proposed changes in land use in the area surrounding the sculpture and preservation of the sculpture have fueled a debate. The sculpture is sometimes visible and sometimes submerged, depending upon the water level of the Great Salt Lake.

The earth artists monumental sculptures of the 1960’s and 70’s artists continue to bring back the question of what should an artist do? In many cases, what the artists were doing by creating monumental works that were visible from the air, amounted to being not much different than massive land displacement projects carried out through mining and urban development.

So there is a question / controversy of ‘should artists engage in the same destruction of environments as heavy industries, even if they have the power and the economy to do so?’

Michael Heizer continues to create his work City in Garden City, Nevada. While Heizer defends City as a monumental reference to ancient land use that showcases and preserves the landscape, it also presents a highly controversial question, ‘Should artists, regardless of justification, be granted the right to create large-scale permanent sculptures in pristine landscapes?’

Within the second wave of earth artists that opened up in the 1980’s, there began to be a more kind appreciation of environment. Wheatfield, A Confrontation, 1982 by SOHO based artist Agnes Denes involved the transformation of two acres of land in Lower Manhattan into a wheat field. The field was in the Battery Park landfill and in the shadow of the Twin Towers, with the New York Stock Exchange looming just outside. Denes had said that her idea was to create “an intrusion of the country into the metropolis, in the world’s richest real estate.” During the course of this project, Denes cleaned trash from the site, brought in topsoil, planted, harvested and exhibited a wheat crop. The seeds from the wheat were then spread around the world to be planted. Denes’ project brought attention to many issues and instigated discussions. Controversy lurks even within this earth artist project as the transportation of seeds falls into one of the characteristics of the Anthropocene, that of introducing invasive species. But Denes was early in the wave of artists trying to effect a positive difference through the work of repurposing and restoring damaged land.

In 2016, what is there that qualifies as untouched nature? After talking around all of the angles, I return to how I have come to be here at the Symposium d’art/nature. One way to begin approaching contemporary issues of climate change and the need to somehow slow the growth of environmental destruction is to internalize it.

When Daniel and I carried out research in the Florida Everglades, for the month of July 2014, it had a mesmerizing effect. We returned to Moncton to build the FLOW: Big Waters project from the research material. As the project continued until March 1, 2016 when we launched the sound walks, we continued to be in the Everglades. In other words, the transformative ‘nature’ of nature continued to surround us. Since that time, our work has been screened at several Miami venues, in Bristol, UK and in Sao Paulo, BR at the FILE 2015.

In March 2015, we presented at the AnthropoScene: Art and Nature in a Manufactured Era Conference, Coral Gables, FL through the University of Miami. A curated program of our FLOW: Big Waters videos was included in the Exhibition at the Abess Centre. We also participated in a panel discussion and conducted a Visible / Invisible workshop. To prepare for the trip, we did a version of the exercise featuring Moncton’s big snow.

DISCUSSING / DECLARING THE ANTHROPOCENE – BY WAY OF BACKGROUND AS THE CONVERSATION CONTINUES …

In 2002, Paul Crutzen proposed the term Anthropocene to designate a new geological era characterized by the impact of human activities on the environment. The beginning is proposed to be the mid-twentieth century when the first nuclear bomb was exploded in the Alamogordo Desert, New Mexico on July 16, 1945. Following that event and subsequent nuclear explosions, a layer of carbon isotope fallout was detected. With the invention of modern construction / manufacturing materials, layers of concrete, plastic and metals were added to the earth’s crust. Human induced migration / displacement of animals through habitat destruction and changes to the atmosphere causing temperature changes and increased evaporation evidence further, that there are rapid changes to the planet itself. (e.g. earth moving; mining; trawling; animal, plant, transport of bacterial and viral organisms through accident, travel and trade.)

In 2015, the Anthropocene Working Group, at the University of Leicester, UK was tasked with studying the factors and making a decision of whether to declare that human activity has created this new era on earth. Their 2016 announcement has changed from asking whether we have transitioned into an age that humans have built – to declaring how its beginning can be marked. One difficulty in declaring beyond doubt, that the planet has entered a new geological era, is the fact that there is no clear line of strata to unearth and to date as was the reliable procedure in the past. However, it is generally agreed that there is an accelerated rate of change to the planet itself, and that this has been the result of human actions.

VISIBLE / INVISIBLE THE IMPOSSIBLE NEGOTIATION: SEEING / NOT SEEING

This time, the conversation begins with experiments in the impossible negotiation of creating almost invisibility from visible passage in a green space.

Science tells us that the existence of visibility and invisibility at the same time is not possible. In the world of glass, it is said that we do not create clarity in the process, instead, we mask the opacity of the material.

To be seen or not seen seems simple enough, until we start to look more closely at the concept of seeing. Then we start recognize that we can miss part of the picture as our ways of seeing often start with expectations and experience; what we think we will see, or what we would like, or not like to see. In terms of the art world, ways of seeing have been and continue to form opening points of many discussions and studies.

Through our project Visible / Invisible, we are working to create invisibility within plain sight, that is to say that no one is going away, everyone continues to exist and to co-exist in multifaceted planes of the software project. Rather than creating true invisibility, we are masking visibility by superimposing another layer overtop of the spect-actor. One reason for creating this ‘imperfect’ invisibility is that concepts of visibility and invisibility open endless possibilities for discussion. We hope to get out to enjoy the outdoor space and to generate opportunities for discussion and reflection on where we stand in the proposed declaration of the Anthropocene.

In chaos theory, the butterfly effect is the sensitive dependence on initial conditions in which a small change in one state of a deterministic nonlinear system can result in large differences in a later state. In another way of seeing it, as our world is not only a mirror but a multifaceted environment, it might be possible to complete the bigger picture, by changing a detail.

What can an artist or any one person working in any chosen field do in the middle of landslide changes to environmental baselines? Why this exercise? If the playground is big, it is not infinite. Our project Visible / Invisible presents an existentialist game where the spec-actors can re-define their presence and rapport with the world.

Valerie LeBlanc

NOTES

Boal, A., (1992). Games for Actors and Non-Actors, Second Edition, (Trans. Adrian Jackson). Routledge, London and New York.

Deleuze, G., Guattari, F., (1987) Milles plateaux (A Thousand Plateaus, Capitalism and Schizophrenia). (Trans. Brian Massumi). University of Minneapolis Press, MN.

Dugas, D. , LeBlanc, V. (Spring 2016). FLOW: Big Waters, Billie, Undercurrents in Atlantic Canadian Visual Art, Volume 1 / ISSUE 2. (Co-Editors: Terry Graff, director/CEO and chief curator), Beaverbrook Art Gallery, Fredericton, NB, pp 6 – 19.

Krause, B. (2012). The Great Animal Orchestra, Finding the origins of Music in the World’s Wild Places, Back Bay Books, Little, Brown and Company, Hachette Book Group, New York, NY.

Louvel, L. (2011). Poetics of the Iconotext. Université de Poitiers, France. (Ed. Karen Jacobs. Trans. Laurence Petit.) Ashgate Publishing Limited, Farnham, Surrey, UK.

Merleau-Ponty, M. (1959). Le visible et l’invisible, [The Visible and the Invisible]. . (Ed. Claude Lefort., Alphonso Lingis, Trans. 1968). Northwestern University Press, Evanston, IL.

Morris, E. (2011). Seeing is Believing (Observations on the Mysteries of Photography), Penguin Books, New York, NY.

Websites (accessed: September 26, 2016)

Marketing

Gordon Matta-Clark, Conical Intersect (1975)

Dennis Oppenheim, Annual Rings (1968)

Smithson, Robert, Spiral Jetty (1970)

Alberta Oil Sands

Michael Heizer, City (1972 – ongoing)

Agnes Denes, Wheat field, a Confrontation (1982)

 

18 Nov

Cultural Flotsam (2016) and Monocultural Stutter (2015) will be playing at the 5th International Video Poetry Festival in Athens (Winter 2016) as well as Illumination (2016) – a collaboration with Daniel H. Dugas.

film-poetry-athens-wp

About Void Network and +the Institute [for Experimental Arts]

The yearly International Video Poetry Festival 2016 will be held for the fifth time in Athens, Greece. Approximately 2500 people attended the festival last year.

There will be two different zones of the festival. The first zone will include video poems, visual poems, short film poems and cinematic poetry by artists from all over the world (America, Asia, Europe, Africa). The second zone will include cross-platform collaborations of sound producers and music groups with poets and visual artists in live improvisations.

The International Video Poetry Festival 2016 attempts to create an open public space for the creative expression of all tendencies and streams of contemporary visual poetry.

12 Nov

My video ‘Cultural Flotsam’ has been curated by Marc Mercier into the 29th Instants Vidéo Festival, Marseille, France. The program is being shown live from on VisualcontainerTV: http://www.visualcontainer.net/

Visual Container TV 24h/24 du 11 novembre au 4 décembre www.visualcontainer.net

Les œuvres seront aussi visibles à la Cartonnerie du 10 au 13 novembre

Stato d’Urgenza Poetica 2

Strukturalizm / Structuralism (3’ – 2016) / Róża Duda (Pologne)
The wind here is very soothing (8’ – 2014) / Draga Jovanovic (Serbie/Canada)
Cultural Flotsam (1’59 – 2016) / Valerie LeBlanc (Canada)
Floating illusion (3’ – 2015) / Chuang Yu-Ju (Taïwan)
I Want To Be Like You (5’45 – 2016) / Dagmar Schürrer (Autriche/Allemagne)
Space Laika (1’18 – 2016) / Egle Vismante (Lituanie/France)
Pietà (8’ – 2007) / konstantinos-antonios goutos / theFlâneu® (Grèce)
La Chambre de Monsieur Tatischeff (5’41 – 2016) / Quelven (France)
Insomnia (5’ – 2015) / Ivetta Kang, Kevin Park & Matthew Wolkow (Corée du Sud/Canada)
Nous sommes B.L.U.S.H. (3’27 – 2015) / Le collectif BLUSH (Québec)
Channel Swimmer (1’17 – 2015) / Jane Glennie (GB)
Thoughts like a wave (4’ – 2016) / Henry Gwiazda (USA)
Hive (Ruche) (4’ – 2014) / Duygu Nazlı Akova (Turquie)
Una mina (7’35 – 2016) / María Papi (Argentine)

 

ABOUT
International Videoart WebChannel since February 2009. Visualcontainer had hosted the most international videoart festivals and curatorial projects from all over the world. Exhibitcontainer host international videoart festivals, videoart project of international videoart curators from all over the world and only on invitation

About Valerie LeBlanc

Originally from Halifax, Nova Scotia, pluri-­disciplinary artist and writer Valerie LeBlanc has worked in Canada, the United States, Europe, and Australia. Her creations travel between poetry, performance, visual and written theory. Valerie LeBlanc has been creating video poetry since the mid 1980’s, and is the creator of the MediaPackBoard (MPB), portable screening / performance device. In the fall of 2012, she published her play The Raft, through Basic Bruegel Editions.

Archives